Mar 1, 2013

Cyborg Nation by Stephanie Krasnow

We are breeding a new generation of human beings who will learn more from a machine than from their mothers


.

It took millions of years of evolution for life on Earth to move out of the oceans onto land, where our
phylogenetic ancestors gasped  for their first breaths on a pebbled beach. Now, some 590,000,000 years later, we find ourselves panting  for air on a virtual  shore.  In the span of just one generation. we've been completely wooed over by the entirely. cerebral  and wholly virtual adventures  accessed when our fingertips apply light pressure  to a plastic mouse.

Today, teenagers in America spend seven hours on a screen each day, eleven if you include multitasking hours. This is more time than human  beings spend doing anything  else. including sleeping. Teenage girls send over 3,700  texts a month,  and even twelve-year­ old girls have over 500 Facebook  friends,  250 of which are total strangers  to them . The combination of online sexual coercion  in chat rooms and cyber-bullying  drove a young Canadian  girl, Amanda  Todd, to suicide.  And just think, it's only been thirty  years- even less for most- since the world wide web came into our lives.

Initially. the internet  was created  by and for the military. For several decades after  that it was used only in emergencies,  and later on by computer engineers.  IT professionals or for the back-end of a few businesses and institutions.  But then came the commercialization of the internet  in 1995, the invention of search  engines in the mid-late 90s, Google in 1998, BlackBerry in 2001, Facebook in 2004,  and the first iPhone in 2007. These events have all occurred in less than twenty years. The most current trend,  the personal computer revolution - where everyone, everywhere, is online, nearly all the time- is very new, less than  five years old. It is this latest trend  which has impacted  our lives the most dramatically, and in a remarkably  unprecedented way if you consider the vast timeline of our development on planet Earth. We are no longer homo sapiens: we're cyborgs.

Our common  understanding of cyborgs are Hollywood cliches: rogue robot with human  skin pulled taut over sleek mctal wiring, and ON/OFF buttons  tucked away in thigh or knee crevasses.  But we don't  have to wait until we embed chips beneath  our skin, nor till we get Google Goggles as contact  lens glued to our eyes, to earn  our status as cyborgian.  As Donna  Haraway famously suggests, we are entirely cyborgs just as we appear  now - with smartphones tucked snugly in our pockets for every minute of every waking hour, held as close as possible to our skin in a hard- to-access area, much like a sacred amulet  was once worn around one's neck in a burlap pouch. In her Cyborg Manifesto, Haraway collapses the boundaries between  human/animal,  and human/machine, suggesting  that there is as much artifice as there is "nature" in human  nature. Our cyborgian condition was not begot by some sinister mutation, rather, we are vitally and inextricably  entwined  with machines  as we are with the bacteria in our intestines.  As Marshall McLuhan  said, "we create machines in our own image and  they, in turn,  recreate us in theirs."

Years before the techno-prolifia  we live in today, McLuhan wrote an eerie forecast that has perhaps now come true: "Man would become ... as it were, the sex organs of the machine world, as the bee of the plant world, enabling it to fecundate and to evolve ever new forms. The machine  world reciprocates  man's love by expediting his wishes and desires,  namely, in providing hirv with wealth."

The bond between man and  machine  indeed glows with eroticism. Technically speaking though,  this relationship is an endosymbiotic  one (a reciprocal  relationship where one being lives within  the body of the other, merging with it). But is it us who live inside the machine, as its
sex organs, or does the machine  live inside us? Contrary to McLuhan, Freud believed the machine lives on us, as an appendage that has enabled  us to become God-like. We're omnipotent,  since we've overcome nature where we can; and, thanks  to Google,  we feel omniscient.  In 1929, Freud wrote in Civilization and its Discontents:

Man has, as it were, become a kind of prosthetic God. When he puts on all his auxiliary  organs he is truly magnificent;  but those organs  [...] still give him much trouble at time:;. Future ages will bring with them new and possibly unimaginably great advances in this field of civilization and will increase man's likeness to God still more. But in the interests  of our present investigation, we will not forget that present-day man does not feel happy in his God-like character.

Generations before Tamagotchi,  Facebook and iPads, Freud sensed  that there was something  primordial  being forsaken as humans  became  more and more civilized, and  he warned  that the prevalent disavowal of our animality  would have costs - psychically, physically, socially, erotically.

Today's most popular  gadgets - those palm-sized avatars of hyper-activity and hyper-connectivity - are precisely so seductive  because they compensate for the physical, social and erotic losses that  technological  advances bring. Every ding,  tweet, ring, and vibration promises a
social, sexual, or professional opportunity. And in less than a decade, our  brains  have been reprogrammed to respond to these dings,  tweets,  rings and vibrations with rushes of dopamine and adrenaline, such that our brains on smartphones look, on an MRI scan, identical to those of an addict on drugs.  The internet's  effects on the brain is the subject  of Nicholas Carr's  bestseller,
The Shallows: What  the internet is doing to our brains, which was nominated  for a Pulitzer  Prize. The latest studies in neuroscience confirm Carr's suspicions that the internet is a detriment to cognition,  concentration, contemplation and psychological  health. These studies are finding that what's  most addictive about the internet is not the technology itself, nor the content,  but these jolts of energy we get from habitual  use of internet application. which foster and  promote  compulsive behaviour.

Peter Whybrow, the director of the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human  Behavior at UCLA, explains that "the computer  is like electronic  cocaine," instigating cycles of mania followed by periods  of depression. "There's just something  about  the medium  that's addictive," adds Elias Aboujaoude, a psychiatrist who manages the Obsessive Compulsive  Disorder  Clinic at Stanford  Medic<'i School. "I've seen plenty of patients who have no history of addictive  behavior - or substance abuse of any kind - become addicted  to the internet  and these other  technologies." Scientists  at Oxford  University warn that children  who spend  too much time on social network sites could suffer from personality  and brain disorders.  Research  published  in China  discovered links between internet  addiction  and "structural abnormalities in gray matter," that is, a fifteen percent shrinkage in the area of the brain that controls  speech,  memory, motor control, emotion, sensory  and other  information. This shrinkage is cumulative:  the more time online, the more gray matter shrivels. From follow-up studies, we learn that it doesn't  take even many hours  online for these changes to occur. Gary Small,  head of UCLA's Memory and Aging Research  Center, documented that even just five hours of internet  use, for web-virgins, substantially rewired  the prefrontal  cortex  of the brain. So we can infer what happens as we spend  more and more hours online. Tbe amount  of time one spends  online is directly correlated  to depression, obesity, ADD,  ADHD,  OCD, and anxiety. New studies  are showing  that internet  and social media use contribute to or instigate  even bigger mental breakdowns: split-personality disorder,  delusional and paranoid  thought,  even psychosis ... psychosis, that is defined as, a loss of what is real.

This research  must not be misinterpreted to suggest that those who've become addicted  to Facebook, smart­ phones, gaming, chatting, or the internet  in general are entirely to be blamed. Is this really their own issue, or is it society's ill? Most people don't  want to be online all the time. But it's a necessity of today's urban, capitalist society tbat employees keep their Blackberrys on and within  reach, even during  holidays and private moments. Many work places  now require  employees to spend at least  eight hours  a day sitting  at a desk staring at a screen. After-hours, the compulsion seeded  by the habits of the workday to surf  the web, refresh email, tweet, update your status  and feel plugged in at all times continues late into the night. How many hours of the day are we not feeding and pruning our virtual alter egos? How many hours of our life are we not busying ourselves, hunting  around  aimlessly on virtual shores? What ways of being, beliefs and  values come along with this new digi-virtual  media realm we are all being sucked into?

We must never lose sight that the internet  is a solipsistic universe - everything you take in is stuff  made by and for humans. No animals,  no trees, no lichen, no insects, no fungi,  none of those beings who help us breathe, none of the creatures who help us play are here. We are just stewing  in our own  juices. For those who do worry over what's  happening  to nature,  there are online portals  which exist to compensate  for this feeling of lack: 360-degree landscapes.  from Peru to the Arctic, all online  to explore, digital animal daemons who'll accompany you on an online adventure. These online animal  avatars are designed  to assuage your anxiety, to help you feel more "natural" and at ease as you muck around  in an entirely digital realm. The YouTube showcase of a starry  sky, the pictures of dogs, the representations of a representation of the real thing out there - offline - this is all wonderful,  this is all we need. The internet  is like humanity's neural network. It mirrors the brain with its networks,  coding systems, information storage and with its highly abstract  and  purely conceptual language.  We feel proud as we look in this mirror.  As we surf the net, we feel a deep sense of awe over our human ingenuity. Permanent browsing has become not just a
vital part of contemporary lifestyle, but a new modality of human  being. Accordingly, the values and meaning with which we imbue life in this world are becoming more and more narrowly  anthropocentric, and more and more cerebral,  abstract, detached  and disembodied.

A word of advice: don't  get too attached.  We're still in a honeymoon  phase with this new technology. The wonders  afforded  by the internet  are still so dazzling  to us that we can't  really question  it, or take into account that this invention  may just be the leading cause of the mental  breakdown of our species. Some 400,000 years ago, Homo Erectus  discovered  how to control fire. Humanity's first technology. As we learned with fire, we must work to master  our inventions in order  to augment their potential,  else they will go out of control, and we get a nuclear  burn.

The internet  enthusiasts who are no doubt severely agitated  by this idea, who are assuming  the author is a primitivistic  luddite overlooking  all the good brought into the world by the world wide web, consider  this: for 100 years we celebrated  the automobile as the ultimate achievement  and invention of our species! What  extraordinary feats we were suddenly capable
of in locomotion and adventure! Not until generations later did we realize  that cars were a leading villain in the destruction of the planet. What will we discover in 100 years about  the internet,  smartphones and other harbingers of virtual life?

Already, our enthusiasm about cyberspace is turning against us, for all the information about ourselves which we volunteer to share online, and the data-trails we leave in our wake as we navigate, are being used against us in the war that's underway against our civil liberties. The obliteration of privacy comes with the appropriation of the internet by Big Daddy as the ultimate surveillance  tool. And the radical potential we've seen in social media is being stolen from us: the insidiousness of advertising is all the more in your face on the internet, more so than it ever was on TV. Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, pitched Facebook as the ultimate advertising platform to Madison Avenue businesses in late 2012. She assured the industry  people that Facebook's number one prerogative is to serve $ucce$$ for those that advertise on it. The internet,  to some, is a crystallization  of, and homage to, the nearly miraculous things human beings can do. We hang on to our God­like abilities attained  via technology because they make us feel invulnerable.Though, a cosmic perspective will always put our precarity back in the spotlight. Amidst these ongoing solar storms, it's possible that one of these gigantic solar flares could hit the planet, and all the electronics and gadgets would he wiped out in an instant.

Stay Alert

OneLove

:::MME:::

The War You Don't See

  Get the book here Excellent interview with Chris Hedges: